“In the past 6 days at least 69 of my Indian soldiers have been killed in unprovoked fire by Pakistan Army,” a fake Twitter handle allegedly that of a serving colonel serving in Jammu and Kashmir said.
The political war among India and Pakistan over New Delhi rejecting Jammu and Kashmir’s exceptional status has overflowed into the digital world, bringing forth a spate of phony internet based life records of Indian armed force officials.
In any event 50 Twitter records taking on the appearance of individual handles of senior officers and commandants including Chief of Army Staff General Bipin Rawat, Northern Army Commander Lieutenant General Ranbir Singh “highlighting alleged atrocities” in Kashmir were closed down in line with the security offices, said senior authorities in the security contraption who would not like to be named.
“In the past 6 days at least 69 of my Indian soldiers have been killed in unprovoked fire by Pakistan Army,” a fake Twitter handle allegedly that of a serving colonel serving in Jammu and Kashmir said.
Also, a phony Twitter account supposedly that of previous Directorate General of Military Operations (DGMO) Lieutenant General Vinod Bhatia stated, “according to my intelligence report there is more than 700 Kashmiri has been killed thousands of women were raped there is completely blackout, school colleges are closed. Shame on Us.”
Moreover, the Twitter handle of previous Vice Chief of Army Staff Devraj Anbu said the evacuation of Article 370 was a major slip-up.
Strikingly, a phony Twitter account supposedly of Lieutenant Colonel Shrikant Purohit who is a denounced in the Malegaon impact case and is presently out on bail additionally conveys a tweet against the foundation.
Since August 5, there has been an unexpected spike in the quantity of online networking accounts, another senior authority said. “These are part of the effort to shape the information environment,” they said.
On August 5, the Center revoked Article 370 that presented unique status to Jammu and Kashmir and split it into two association regions.
Intriguingly, a portion of the phony Twitter records were opened in months ahead of time however were torpid up till August 2019.
“An analysis shows a clear trend, some of these fake accounts posted normal humdrum stuff on and off. The credibility of the people behind the accounts ensured an organic growth in the number of followers. An account of serving colonel opened in July 2019 gathered over 1500 followers. After, August 5, these handles tried to saturate the environment with messages about atrocities in Jammu and Kashmir and Article 370,” a third senior authority observing the digital world said.
The ambush in the digital world has been serious to the point that New Delhi has entrusted a group involving security offices and the military to screen the digital world for such messages and counter them. The messages from the phony records of surely understood people make question among the individuals everywhere, influence the assurance of the country and, at another level they influence the powers too, said an official related with observing these messages.
“The removal of Article 370 has put the Pakistan Army in a spot which for the last 70 years has claimed to be the saviours of Kashmir. At another level, they have always used proxies whether in 1947, 1965 and 1999. The fake social media messaging is aimed at gaining moral ascendency over India by trying to create a fake narrative,” said Major General (Retd) Harsha Kakar.
The Bharatiya Janata Party is arranging more prominent hierarchical job to its moderately more youthful pioneers in regions and state bodies through inward races that will commence one month from now, two BJP pioneers said.
The thought is to give reins of the state units to pioneers who are 55 or less, and put considerably more youthful pioneers responsible for the region and units underneath that.
The BJP on Saturday selected Sanjay Jaiswal (53) and Satish Poonia (55) as its leader in Bihar and Rajasthan. Swatantra Dev Singh who took over as UP BJP boss in July is additionally 55. Karnataka also got Nalin Kumar Kateel (52) as the new president in August.
“We feel this is the time for a generational change in the party,” said a BJP general secretary on condition of anonymity. “The leadership issue is settled in the party, and younger leaders who get an opportunity today can be groomed for bigger roles in next 15 years.”
This system will likewise have its appearance in the group of national office bearers when it is established after the appointment of Jagat Prakash Nadda as the gathering president by year end.
“The RSS is also going through a similar change and leaders in the age group of 50-55 are getting promotion over those who are older to them. There is a general admission within the Sangh parivar and its affiliates that a new and young leadership needs to be promoted for next 15-20 years,” the second BJP pioneer cited in the story said.
There can be sure special case, yet the general thought is to have pioneers in the age section of 50-55 years in positions of authority, this pioneer said.
In July, the RSS and the BJP picked 53-year-old BL Santosh over senior pracharaks, for example, Saudan Singh and V Satish for the post of the authoritative secretary. This post whenever saved for RSS pioneers lent to the BJP, and is in charge of the organsiational matters of the gathering.
The BJP is at present holding a confirmation of its participation base, and the hierarchical races will begin from one month from now. The BJP group at stall, mandal and state levels will picked among October and November, before the appointment of the national president in December last or early January.
There will be change of administration in some different states and more youthful appearances will supplant existing president, the main chief said. “The idea behind younger presidents is also to influence a new energy into the party, particularly in states where the BJP sees an opportunity to grow,” this pioneer said.
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Counsel Broadcast journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.
